About The Editor

 


Who writes Global Wellness Hub 


Global Wellness Hub is edited by Hamad Alanazi , who works in asset management and holds a professional background spanning institutional insurance and commercial real estate in Saudi Arabia.

That background is not a medical one, and this site does not pretend otherwise. What it does provide is direct working familiarity with the systems that sit behind healthcare rather than inside the exam room: how insurance coverage is structured, how claims are assessed and denied, and how the cost of care moves through institutions before it ever reaches a patient's bill.

Qualifications 

Diploma in Banking and Insurance, King Faisal University

FAL Real Estate Brokerage Licence

Property management certification, Saudi Real Estate Institute

Professional experience across institutional insurance and commercial real estate asset management

What this site does, and what it does not do 

This is a reporting publication, not a medical practice. Nothing here is written from clinical expertise, and nothing here should be read as a diagnosis, a treatment plan, or personalized medical advice.

What the site does instead is go back to primary research. When a health claim circulates widely, the work is to locate the actual study behind it, read what it measured, check whether it was conducted in humans or in animals or in a laboratory, and report both what the evidence supports and what it does not. Where a claim cannot be traced to research from a recognized university, a regulatory body, or a peer-reviewed journal, that gap is stated plainly rather than filled with a weaker source.

The editorial standard 

Sources are limited to primary research from recognized universities, regulatory agencies including the FDA, CDC, NIH, and WHO, and major peer-reviewed journals. Every factual claim is attributed. Studies conducted in animals or cell models are labeled as such, never presented as though they applied to people.

Articles state their limits. When the evidence is early, small, or inconsistent, the article says so. When a widely repeated claim turns out to be unsupported, the article says that too, including when the correction is less interesting than the original claim.

AI-assisted tools support research and drafting. Every article is reviewed and fact-checked by a person before publication.

Contact 

Questions, corrections, and requests for a source can be sent to hello@globalwellnesshub.health. Corrections are welcomed and acted on.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Cancer Vaccine Built From Your Own Tumor Just Cleared Its Biggest Test Yet

Image
Written by the Global Wellness Hub Editorial Team · Reviewed for accuracy For the first time, a personalized cancer vaccine built from mRNA technology, the same platform behind the COVID-19 vaccines, has succeeded in a Phase 3 trial. The announcement, made this week by Moderna and Merck, marks a genuine first in oncology, and it's worth understanding what the vaccine actually is, what the trial found, and what still isn't known. What makes this vaccine different from a normal one? Unlike a traditional vaccine that protects against a virus, this one is built individually for each patient. It's classified as an individualized neoantigen therapy, meaning each dose is manufactured from the specific mutations found in that patient's own tumor after it's surgically removed, then combined with Merck's existing immunotherapy drug Keytruda (pembrolizumab). The goal isn't prevention in the traditional sense, it's teaching the immune system to recognize and attack ...
Read more

No, the Sunscreen Study Was Not Retracted. Here Is What It Actually Found.

Image
Written by the Global Wellness Hub Editorial Team · Reviewed for accuracy What started this latest sunscreen scare?  Every few months, a post goes viral claiming that sunscreen does more harm than the sun itself. The current version points to a real study, one that found certain sunscreen ingredients absorb into the bloodstream at levels above an FDA technical threshold. From there, the posts jump to a conclusion the study never made: that sunscreen causes cancer and should be avoided [JAMA]. The gap between those two sentences is where millions of readers get lost. So we went back to the actual trials, including the only randomized controlled trial that has ever tracked melanoma outcomes in sunscreen users over more than a decade. And before we start, one question readers keep asking deserves a direct answer up front. Was a sunscreen study retracted?  No. The JAMA absorption studies remain published and cited by the FDA in its ongoing rulemaking on sunscreen safet...
Read more

The Best Time to Exercise, According to the Trials That Actually Compared Them

Image
Written by the Global Wellness Hub Editorial Team · Reviewed for accuracy Ask when you should train and you will get a confident answer either way. Morning people will tell you fasted cardio at 6am is the whole secret. Evening people will tell you your body is not even warmed up until the afternoon. Both sound authoritative, and both are usually arguing from personal habit rather than from research. There is actual research on this, though, and it is more specific than either camp suggests. Several randomized trials have put morning training directly against evening training in the same study, measured real outcomes, and found that the answer changes depending on what you are trying to achieve. Here is what those trials found, what they could not settle, and one thing worth understanding before any of it matters. Does timing matter more than just showing up?  No, and this is the part worth fixing in place before anything else. Every trial discussed here compares one training time a...
Read more